Wednesday, August 18, 2010
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Often times we criticize politicians as a whole failing to recognize the ones that are fighting and laying it out on the line every day. Yes, there are good politicians, politicians who seemingly remain unaffected by the Washington illness which has been known to spread quickly among politicians and government employees here in Washington, DC. The most recognizable side effect being corruption and accompanied with deceitfulness. Though they may be few and far between and regrettably now is not the time to go through the list of the good guys (or gals), there are a few that I do admire and I feel comfortable recognizing without closer scrutiny (what can I say, I’m suspicious by nature and I cannot recognize a politician that I have not verified personally…just can’t). I would like to thank Rep Issa for his relentless pursuit of corruption even while having to deal with the repercussions that come about when questioning and/or calling out part of the large left machine called ACORN along with the union in which it conspires with. He continues to stand up for the foundation in which our country was built on. The same is true for Jim Demint, Michelle Bachmann, Marsha Blackburn, Marco Rubio, and a few others who refuse to quit fighting the good fight.
Umm...is this supposed to be news? I'm glad we have discovered this video disproving Obama but I question the person who finds this bit of information shocking, I really question their understanding and grasp on reality. I mean that with all due respect.
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Gibbs, who's already following most of the White House press corps, offered up his first tweet Saturday afternoon: "Learning about "the twitter" - easing into this with first tweet - any tips?"He has free time? Then get off the clock! Why are our tax dollars being used to pay for your "free time"!
"You know," Gibbs added, "plus I’ve got all this free time on my hands!"
Being an official White House Twitter account, Gibbs' page notes that "comments & messages received through official WH pages are subject to the PRA and may be archived
Gibbs is probably the most annoying person in the admin though that’s a tough call so let’s just say he is def in the running for first place! He reminds me of that obnoxious kid from high school that you wanted to get away from you! He is not only gross but he is rude too. You can always count on Gibbs for three things...first, you can count on Gibbs to be lying. I wonder if he knows how to tell the truth? Hmm...
Second, he won’t make sense. Some commentators like to say that he's unintelligent but I respectfully disagree. I think he is outsmarting everyone by sounding like a babbling idiot. He never answers any question and by the time he is finished, you're so exhausted and irritated by his ramble that you’d rather leave your question unanswered than have him go on for another second! Lastly, you can always count on Gibbs to be condescending! He has no respect for anyone. A press secretary is supposed to be the mouth piece of the administration; you want a friendly, intelligent, witty individual in that job. You want the American people to trust and respect that person as their word is very important. Gibbs is not that person!
I wrote more than I initially intended but that needed to be said...
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
It seems like people do mess with Joe...beginning with the President himself.
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
"A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee." - Bill Clinton
Haven’t gotten through it but let’s skip over the Reid comment, frankly because he makes me nauseous and smells, to address Clinton's comment with reference to Obama fetching coffee. Was Clinton's comment rude? Perhaps…is it offensive? Yes, if you are Obama and only if you're Obama. Otherwise, get the fudge over it. Its more of a personal slight towards Obama than anything else.
Defending Clinton is not something I relish in doing but these people in the media (particularly on cable news show) who are dismissing Reid’s imbecilic racist statement while trying to bash Clinton and throw the racism book at him are perversely incorrect or just pure charlatans clinging so tightly onto their hidden agendas.
Clinton spoke about Obama…Obama happens to be black and white…saying something rude about Obama doesn’t mean that it is in reference to his skin color. That doesn’t mean that people don’t make racist comments. For instance Harry Reid’s comment was pretty moronic and racist. But by attempting to decipher what Clinton meant by his comment, we begin to take on the role of the thought police. He said that Obama would have been getting his coffee a couple years ago. To me, that sounds like he was talking about his inexperience, his younger age, his thin resume, etc. After all, he’s not wrong, a few years ago, Obama was a nobody freshman Illinois Senator. To Clinton, this guy probably looked as if he were one of Clinton’s interns…wow I just fell into that didn’t I? (Well not one of those interns but you know what I mean...an intern not "an intern"...)
Nonetheless, fetching coffee is not racist unless you infer that the person is fetching coffee because of their skin color. If we start beating Clinton up about this then it sets a dangerous precedent for the future. What are we allowed to say? Are we allowed to even joke around anymore? Can we be rude without being racist?
What Harry Reid said was wrong, Clinton…rude, pompous, arrogant but I’m not in his head (nor would I want to be) to know what he meant by it and neither is anybody else. If you want to scold anyone, turn to Reid, if you’re over it (much like I am) then move on and write a blog about it or something.
By the way, I’m not white so I’m totally allowed to write about matters of race. Got to love these exceptions right? (being facetious)
Sunday, January 10, 2010
"Coming this winter to C-SPAN:via Reason
The true story... of 535 politicians...picked to live in two houses...work together and their lives taped...to find out what happens...when Congress stops being polite...and starts secret, detailed negotiations on a sweeping, transformative health care reform bill...
This is the real Real World DC.
Featuring Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Charles Rangel, Robert Byrd, Barney Frank, Max Baucus...and billions of taxpayer dollars."
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Don't misunderstand, I love snow, not only because its beautiful and calming but because Al Gore gets proven wrong each and every time it snows here in DC.
(picture from last storm)
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Obama couldn’t have been clearer on the campaign trail when he pledged, not once, not twice, but at least eight times that he would have C-SPAN televise the health-crap bill negotiations, negotiations that usually take place in closed backrooms where shady deals are made.
Concerned by the lack of transparency in this administration, C-SPAN CEO, Brian Lamb, sent a letter to the stooges in Congress, oops I mean Nancy and Harry, asking them to allow C-SPAN to come in and broadcast the reconciliation negotiations...again, not out of the ordinary since Obama made the pledge himself.
The C-SPAN networks will commit the necessary resources to covering all of these sessions LIVE and in their entirety...
President Obama, Senate and House leaders, many of your rank-and-file members, and the nation’s editorial pages have all talked about the value of transparent discussions on reforming the nation’s health care system. Now that the process moves to the critical stage of reconciliation between the Chambers, we respectfully request that you allow the public full access, through television, to legislation that will affect the lives of every single American.
We hope you will give serious consideration to this request...
For the left, the ends justify the means. They want to pass this bill by any means necessary and deal with the repercussions later. This bill is so awful and the stooges are so corrupt that they have to pass it quickly without anyone reading it, no bi-partisan support, and what's even more concerning is the fact that they have to bribe their own party to vote for this horrendous bill. How can anyone support this bill based on those facts?Even if they support the content, the process itself should cause hesitation to supporters and opponents alike.
Ha. The notion that they would allow C-SPAN to broadcast the negotiations…they won’t even let one single Republican in! Freakin Nuts!
Brian Lamb deserves recognition and applause for questioning this administration, something that he MSM libtards clearly could not…or would not do.
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Could it be true! It is being reported that Sen. Chris Dodd is not going to be seeking reelection!
Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee and a Democratic Party stalwart in the Senate, is set to announce today that he will not seek re-election this year, according to a party strategist familiar with his plans.
Sen. Dodd's decision was the latest in a string of big-name Democratic retirements revealed Tuesday as the party struggles to contend with a challenging political climate.
If this information is accurate then 2010 just may turn out to be a good year and the beginning of a great decade!
If all these dem Senators and Congressmen are planning on retiring after this term, then there is a legitimate argument to be made about their voting on a disastrous health-fraud bill and their lack of concern relating to its consequences…they are basically going to hit us while we are turned around and run.
While I normally don’t use profanity, there are certain moments that call for it! This is one. It’s a b*tch move.
The Heckler was right!
Friday, January 1, 2010
For the most part, I would say that I'm a realist but I choose to remain a little bit more optimistic regarding regime change in Iran. I can understand why Krauthammer is less enthusiastic, if any other President were in power, I think they would have certainly used the opportunity in Iran to not only assist Iranians in obtaining freedom but also because it would mean a more stable Iran, one less crazy dictator, and more stability in the region.
I'm not confident that Obama views this as an opportunity but rather an annoyance that has caused his bowing-begging foreign policy to come to a halt...for now that is.
Thursday, December 31, 2009
In an interview with The Associated Press, Pahlavi equated the climate of the unrest in his homeland with the "revolutionary atmosphere" that preceded the fall of his father from the Peacock Throne 30 years ago, when the monarchy was replaced by an Islamic republic.
In the letter Pahlavi urged the U.N. chief to press Iran to release those arrested and act to "halt the intolerable and increasingly dangerous march of events." The letter was given to the AP Thursday.
Pahlavi said that recalling ambassadors would be a "minimal but clear indication" by U.N. member states of their support for the rights of Iranian citizens and objections to violations of these rights by Iranian authorities.
"This is not about me. I'm not here to advocate anything but ... freedom and democracy for the Iranian people at first and I've determined this as my unique mission in life."
Still, he acknowledged that "I carry on my shoulders the historic weight of an institution that I may potentially represent."
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
(video report via FoxNews below)
HONOLULU — Conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh was taken to a hospital after suffering chest pains and was resting comfortably Wednesday, his radio program said in a statement. "Rush was admitted to and is resting comfortably in a Honolulu hospital today after suffering chest pains," the statement said. "Rush appreciates your prayers and well wishes and will keep you updated via rushlimbaugh.com and on his radio program."I hope Rush gets better, we need him to fight the good fight!
Kit Carson, Limbaugh's chief of staff, said he had no further information on Limbaugh's condition.
As I was browsing different articles trying to obtain as much information as I could about Rush’s condition, I was disgusted by the lib-tard medias reports and bias. Without fail, almost every article includes garbage relating to his past which has no significance to this story. Even more disturbing were the comments posted by obvious left-wing-nutties. Twitter has also been full of activity as the crazy’s use this opportunity to bash him. Whatever your views on Rush or for that matter ANYONE with whom you disagree, HAVE RESPECT.
When it comes down to it, it exhibits a level of classlessness. Conservatives, for the most part, do not use their disagreements to attack their opponents in the same personal manner as liberals (not all liberals but as a generality), its not even close. Most conservatives would wish the other person well by stating something along the lines of…Though I don’t agree with so-and-so and we've been political foes in the past, we wish him well.
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Obama needs to come out stronger than ever in denouncing the current regime in Iran, preferably using the same ferocity and passion he uses to scold his political opponents. What will it take? How many times does the regime have to reject Obama before he understands that negotiations are impossible when dealing with impossible people. The United States has always stood for freedom in the past, its pretty pathetic that it has taken this long for him to come out but like Krauthammer, I refuse to clap and thank him for his statement. Its long overdue and was lacking. Get it together.
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Watch the video below as Michelle Malkin discusses the appalling information regarding School Czar, an Obama appointee, Kevin Jennings. Recognize that she has to be restrained regarding the amount of detail she can discuss as television has certain regulations in which she must abide. On the other hand, it’s nice to know that television has such regulations but apparently children don’t, 14 year olds are supposedly old enough to be introduced to sexually explicit lectures and instructions on methods to insert certain…(ah can’t even go further than that, it’s that bad!). Let’s just say that they are calling this scandal “fistgate”. Kevin Jennings needs to get…and quickly! As more information surfaces on his past endeavors, affiliations with organizations, or statements made referencing his ideology, it is non-negotiable; he needs to get to steppin!
The Washington Times had an editorial piece on Kevin Jennings appropriately titled 'Obama's risky-sex czar'. They had to place a warning before the article to caution its readers about the contents. Come on, when the Washington times has to place a disclaimer…ITS THAT FREAKIN BAD. Here's the disclaimer and portions of the article...
WARNING: This editorial includes discussion of topics that are sexually graphic.
Under usual circumstances, we would never entertain these subjects or the rancid language involved. In this case, however, a very unusual exception must be made because the issues are central to the background of a senior presidential appointee at the U.S. Department of Education who is in a position to influence how and what our children are taught in our nation's schools. Thus far, out of fear or squeamishness, there has been public hesitance to examine closely the beliefs of this individual because many are afraid even to touch the risky content. Our scruples cannot be used against us when traditional moral precepts need to be defended. Simply, the deep level of depravity involved in this subject cannot be portrayed without providing a couple of examples to illustrate the inappropriate content. Please do not read any further if you will be offended by sexually graphic language.
They go on to reveal some disturbing information;
The Obama administration is stonewalling serious inquiries about sexual filth propagated by a senior presidential appointee who is responsible for promoting and implementing federal education policy. Democrats clearly are terrified of ruffling the feathers of their activist homosexual supporters, who are an influential part of the Democratic party's base. This scandal, however, is not merely about homosexual behavior; it is about promoting sex between children and adults - and it's time for President Obama to make clear that abetting such illegal perversion has no place in his administration.
The conference discussions were very graphic and cannot be relayed in full detail in a family newspaper. A few examples are sufficient to describe the depravity of the subject matter. During one session about oral sex, a presenter asked the 14-year-old students: "Spit or swallow? Is it rude?" In another session, the 14-year-olds are taught about a gross practice called "fisting," in which "the man leading the discussion position[ed] his hand and show[ed] 14-year-olds how to insert their entire hand into the rectum of their sex partner."
As the article points out in the conclusion, neither the administration nor Obama himself has come out answer questions. Concerned parents and citizens have a right to know what the heck is going on and why this administration would appoint a man with this background to this position.
Are we being Punked?!
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
McCain's wondering (as we all are) where the transparency is and why C-SPAN is not present as promised...
Saturday, December 5, 2009
This is not the first time that this has happened and beyond it being something amusing to observe, from what I remember about body language, this gesture is not uncommon. I’m not directly referring to flicking off people, though I’m sure that is quite popular as well. I was referencing the whole head itching flicking off movement, which has now occurred on numerous occasions. Each time, the act came upon hearing the name of a rival or a fren-enemy.
For most people, this is a subconscious gesture signifying the hatred/dislike/anger of the person doing it and the person whose name they are mentioning. This makes absolute sense considering the first time Obama did this it was upon hearing Hillary’s name, then McCain’s, and now mayor John Callahan who by the way was a supporter of his opponent Hillary Clinton. Each of us has our own expressions that we exhibit unintentionally and can really provide insight as to how we truly feel. Obama's rhetoric is obviously pleasant because it has to be but body language says it all.
Whether Obama is conscious of his little flip scratch thing, I can’t really say but I can tell you that his head was not itching. Take that to the bank…jk
(Okay I just rewatched it and I'm so right! Pay close attention, not to words but to expressions, they’ll show everything, no matter how hard someone tries to hide it. He def. is holding grudges! That is too funny!)
I posted the videos of Obama flicking off McCain and Hillary below...
Notice how the crowd cheers after he flicks off Hillary...I'm beginning to think that it may be intentional. What do you think?
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Btw...He did it on MSNBC no less, he aint scurredd! Go ahead Senator!
The President excluded, the White House Press Secretary is the 2nd most visible person within an administration. Obama's Press Secretary, Robert Gibbs, has been probably one of the worst in recent years. He is delusional, confused, clueless (or portrays as such), even worse, he tends to be very confrontational. He speaks as if he is above everyone. You may ask a totally reasonable question, instead of answering or declining to answer, he thinks he's on a comedy stage and it’s 'The Gibbs Show'.
APRIL RYAN: Did she invite herself to the state dinner or was she a guest of, did the President invite her, or did she put her name on, no, that's a real question, do not fan at all.
ROBERT GIBBS: I, I, Jonathan?
RYAN: I'm serious. No, seriously? Did she invite herself or did the President ask her. Her name was on that list and social secretaries are the ones who put the names on the list.
RYAN: Did she invite herself, or did the president--
GIBBS: Right, was she at the dinner? April, April, calm down. Just take a deep breath for one second. See,this happens with my son. He does the same thing.
[reporters in the briefing room: Oooooh!]
RYAN: Don't play with me!
GIBBS: I'm not.
RYAN: I'm being serious. Do not blow at all.
GIBBS: And I'm giving you a serious answer. Was she at the dinner? Yes.
RYAN: Was she an invited guest?
GIBBS: She's the social secretary. She had the primary responsibility--
RYAN: No, social secretaries are not guests of the dinner.